What is the difference between flickr and photobucket

Saturation refers to the intensity of colors. Images with high levels of saturation have vivid colors, while unsaturated images appear greyish. When taking a photo within the app, you can touch in two different areas to set the exposure and the focus separately. This is more advanced over most camera apps which normally only allow you to choose one area to both focus on and set the exposure of the image.

Effects 1. Filters allow you to apply effects to your image with one touch, usually with a range of effects such as retro films or sketches. Image sharpening tools emphasize the edges within an image. This can be applied to a blurred image to make it appear sharper and more detailed. It works by applying a blur to parts of the image which simulates a shallower depth of field, even on objects far away.

Using the brush tool you can paint across the image, or use it to make small adjustments to touch up the image. I wish flickr would consider black or at least give you that option. Thank you, Robert Nyman, you are the man! I had only used Flickr up until now, but after two days of intense reading and deciphering the differences between the Two that you have waxed on about in your comparisons, I being a Macbook Pro man have decided to look seriously into the Smugmug venue.

I am concerned about the video capacity though, as I am awaiting the arrival of my new D3s, I know, I know, ok, hold the applause, I too am happy in my anticipation , LOL. So, I hope that soon that video capacity will soon be addressed!

Have a great day, and I look forward always to reading informative and intelligent commentary. Yours, is that! SmugMug and Flickr are great at complementing each other, I think. Personally, I'd definitely recommend trying SmugMug out because it's quite good. SmugMug — nice review from — need to post my photography setup and storage and reasoning. Also need to take more photos! I've been using Picasa website for about 4 years, but I'm searching for another photo sharing site.

I currently have one on 23 photo sharing site, and have been considering Flickr since that seems to be pretty popular — but I don't want a Yahoo account. So a friend will be using SmugMug, and I've read about Zenfolio…. So I'm on the first day of my 14 trial and didn't plan on paying anything, but this looks pretty good, so that may change depending if I stay with Smug.

Glad you liked it! There are so many factors that play in, and most photo sharing web sites naturally have their pros and cons. Play around, and choose what fits you best. I'm at the stage where I want to add my travel images on a site for possible inclusion to a stock image agency.

On the one hand I am interested in the Getty 'Call for Artists' group on Flickr, and so torn between creating a pro account for my serious stuff for that group, which of course will be combined with my disconnected fun stuff, or create a Smugmug website for the purpose of showcasing the commercial side of my nature.

Smugmug certainly looks the business in terms of image presentation. I just don't want both sites. Why I have stepped out of retirement to do this I don't know! Should I leave it to the toss of a coin? I still can't choose myself and currently have my pictures on both of them.

Time for me to toss the coin as well? I use smugmug pro. They do really good work printing and have a bunch of options that you can offer to clients. It can upload as well as download. It supports multiple clouds including SmugMug, Picasa and many more. Very often when starting up Firefox the plugin states that a new cloud is supported. Smugmug is the best online sharing photo tool I ever used.

Beside the fact that it stores your photos in full size and that it offers really unlimited storage, it can be upgraded with tons of community tools upload from right click, ….

It starts at Living km from my family, smugmug is a must have to share moments in pictures, also as a part time professional photographer smugmug has been very useful sharing and promoting my work.

Strengths: — Full size pictures — Really unlimited storage — Great themes — Easy to use — Nice interface — Community creating addons upload from right click, screensavers…. Weaknesses: — It is not a photo backup tool as you cannot bulk restore photos from galleries, you have to order DVDs from smugmug.

We really like how the interface is simple, elegant and fairly easy to use. But one of the key reasons is that we wanted a clean add-free environment. There is also a place where you can request that an entirely gallery get zipped into a single file. It takes the server a while to finish, but once it does you get a URL of the zipped file ready for download. Your email address will not be published. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pricing Both services have understood that the only reasonable way to go is to offer a flat rate for unlimited storage and bandwidth, and this goes for both images and videos. Uploading There are a vast number of uploading tools for both Flickr and SmugMug, stand-alone apps as well as integrated plugins.

Uploading performance I have compared Flickr to SmugMug intensively for about three months now, and uploading to SmugMug is consistently and considerably faster. My choice: Lightroom plugins Jeffref Friedl has put together two great plugins for Adobe Lightroom , my application for image control, and those are the only ones I use: Export to Flickr Lightroom Plugin Export to SmugMug Lightroom Plugin Downloading For me, using these services are as much for backup purposes as being able to present my pictures to friends and family.

I would really like to call for an official shape-up here. Sharing: public and private When it comes to sharing, or, better put, protecting and controlling who sees your images, the companies have taken two very different routes, and both have pros and cons. Security with Flickr Flickr has a model where you can set for images whether they should be seen by anyone, people marked as your friends, considered your family or completely protected. Personally, I also think groups seem to work much better with Flickr.

Layout and layout control When it comes to actually presenting your pictures, I believe this is one of the areas where SmugMug revels. Compare our pictures from China on Flickr and on SmugMug below: After that, compare viewing the first picture in a large view, where Flickr almost completely loses its relations, but SmugMug stays just the same, since it shows the large picture together with accompanying thumbnails: To me, this is one of the vital things it comes down to in the end: how easy is it to look at the images, and how good to I deem this approach to be when I want my pictures to be seen by friends, family and others?

Keyboard shortcut support SmugMug has the nice decency to allow a viewer to move back and forward between images with the arrow keys; an approach also implemented by Picasa Web Albums as well.

Domain name and customization While Flickr only offers you a few options whether to present images, sets and collections in your user start page, with a SmugMug Power or Pro account, you have the control to write code and tweak your themes any way you want to.

Geotagging In this day and age, naturally every picture has to have information attached where it was taken, right? What I want out of a badge for an image service I use are these, seemingly, easy criteria: Being able, in a single call, to get a specified of random images from my entire public collection.

Getting the data as JSON, so I can control it myself, instead of some dreadful page-stalling document. Video support Tie. Uploading SmugMug. Downloading Flickr. Sharing: public and private Tie. A menu will come up where you'll be able to select whatever sizes are available for the photo.

Choose the size you want to download it instantly. Flickr may be in cahoots with Yahoo, but a well built Flickr site optimized for search engines and used creatively for marketing will do your business good in Google and beyond.

If you haven't checked out Flickr yet you should. Photobucket is a media storage site that allows members to upload photos and video to a personal account and share it with others. But perhaps more importantly, members can also display their photos on other Web sites by including a direct link, which refers back to the original images stored on Photobucket's servers. Skip to content Technology. April 30, Joe Ford. Table of Contents. In addition, Photobucket describes the ability to share links to your photos with friends and family and even features although less confidently the ability to tag, but the website seems to be less about sharing with the community of Photobucket; Flickr on the other hand seems to have a preset group of people that the user does not know who might be interested in looking at his or her pictures as a result of the clearly described and promoted tagging system.

Flickr seems more useful in that they can serve the same function as Photobucket just mentioned, but also foster the capacity for easily browsing others photos related to a particular interest or interacting with other photo enthusiasts.

Filed under Uncategorized. Tagged as albums , Flickr , Photobucket , photosharing , pictures. Photobucket has almost always disappointed me in my adventures online. Half the time, the link to the desired picture was broken.

If it did manage to redirect to the site, the photo was usually unavailable or removed. The linking fossils of these long extinct images cruelly tantalize with the promise of content, but ultimately fail to deliver anything but frustration.

Flickr has had a much better track record, but I rarely see it used in my usual online haunts. If someone wanted to share a quick funny image, or briefly upload a photo set, they would be better off using a different service.

However, Flickr shines in its ability to provide venues for large and long term projects and content that users want to stay online for a period of time. I agree that Flickr is initially easier to use than Photobucket. The Flickr homepage is well organized and prominently displays a button to take a tour of the site.